## Episode 323: Diffraction

Lesson for 16-19

- Activity time 85 minutes
- Level Advanced

Note the spelling – double ff. The first *recorded* observation of diffraction was by Grimaldi in 1665. The shadows cast by light sources were not quite the same size as the anticipated geometrical shadows. Furthermore, very close to the edges, the shadows were bordered by alternate bright and dark fringes or bands. What good observation – given the sources of light available in 1665!

Lesson Summary

- Demonstration: Observing the effect (10 minutes)
- Demonstration: Ripple tank and/or laser (20 minutes)
- Discussion: Deriving the formula (20 minutes)
- Discussion: Resolution (15 minutes)
- Student experiment: Resolution of spectral lines (20 minutes)

## Demonstration: Observing the effect

A distant light bulb viewed through the gap between the prongs of a tuning fork shows clear dark and bright bands. The effective gap can be altered by turning the tuning fork. Simply making a narrow gap between an index finger and thumb can produce the same effect.

## Demonstration: Ripple tank and/or laser

For a larger scale demo from which to draw qualitative conclusions use either or both of:

- a ripple tank
- a single slit with laser light

(The slit width can be changed by simply turning it about a vertical axis perpendicular to the beam.)

Episode 323-1: Ripple tank diffraction (Word, 33 KB)

## Safety

Provided the laser is class 2 (less than 1 mW), the warning *Do not stare down the beam* is sufficient. Avoid specular reflections.

## Summarise findings:

- A pattern of intensity maxima and minima is formed
- The pattern is symmetrical
- The central maximum is wider than the other maxima (unlike with Young’s two slit fringes)
- The maxima and minima are evenly spaced
- The intensity falls off with angle (distance from the central fringe)
- The spreading depends upon the wavelength and the gap width – l less than gap width gives less spreading out; l equal to gap width gives biggest effect; l greater than gap width results in the wave being almost blocked
- Energy in the incident beam has been redistributed

## Discussion: Deriving the formula

For the minima in the diffraction pattern:

sin( θ ) = *m**l**d*

where *m* is an integer and *d* is the slit width. To derive this, we have to imagine that each point across the width of the slit is sending rays to every point on the screen.

Episode 323-2: Diffraction at a single aperture (Word, 75 KB)

## Discussion: Resolution

At this point, you could discuss the idea of *resolution* . Resolution refers to the ability to distinguish two objects that are close together. The light from an object is diffracted by the aperture of the viewing instrument. Two neighbouring objects can be resolved provided that the peak from the central maximum of one is no closer than the first minimum of the other (and vice versa). This is called the Rayleigh Criterion.

For light of wavelength *λ* passing through an aperture of width *a*, the central maximum and first minimum are separated by an angle *λ*b. If *d* is the actual separation of the two objects and *L* their distance from the aperture then

*d**L* = *λ* *b*

Take care! This has an identical mathematical form to the Young two slits formula – so beware possible confusion.

Explore the dependence on *λ* and on *b* for two given objects (i.e. *d* and *L* given). Resolution improves if *λ* get smaller and or *b* gets smaller (i.e. shorter wavelengths and smaller apertures).

## Student experiments: Resolution of lines

How far away from a student observer can the lines on differently coloured J

cloths be distinguished?

Alternatively, rule pairs of differently coloured lines 1mm apart on some white card. Decide how far away from the card can you stand and just distinguish the pairs as two separate lines.

Assume the eye pupil is 2 mm diameter. You will need to decide on wavelength values for the different colours.

Check that the data is consistent with the Rayleigh Criterion.

Episode 323-3: Distinguishing lamps as separate (Word, 38 KB)

A slightly more sophisticated experiment could involve the use of a pin-hole camera (this also makes a good suggestion for a course work investigation). For circular apertures, the formula for the first diffraction minima is modified slightly to be

1.22 *λ* *b*
, where *b* is now the diameter of the hole (rather than the width of the slit).