Energy as a conserved quantity
Physics Narrative for 11-14
Conservation of energy
Richard Feynman, one of the most celebrated 20th century physicists, describes the idea of energy conservation eloquently (Feynman, Lectures in Physics vol. 1, 1963, p. 4–1):
There is a fact, or if you wish a law, governing all natural phenomena that are known to date. There is no exceptions to this law – it is exact so far as is known. The law is called the conservation of energy. It says that there is a certain quantity, which we call energy, that does not change in the manifold changes which nature undergoes. That is a most abstract idea, because it is a mathematical principle; it says that there is a numerical quantity, which does not change when something happens.
Feynman has a story about the conservation of energy, pointing to this abstract calculated nature. The story is also useful as a reminder that through many changes the energy tends to become more and more spread out, or dissipated, appearing in different stores, and in ways that make it harder and harder to use as a fuel.
He introduces the difficulties in tracking the energy, with increasing ingenuity needed to track down the blocks. But please remember that this is just a story – there are no tangible energy blocks!
It was also a story told to highly numerate American undergraduates, and therefore does not necessarily form the best basis for teaching UK teenagers.
Imagine a child, perhaps
Dennis the Menace, who has blocks which are absolutely indestructible, and cannot be divided into pieces. Each is the same as the other.
Let us suppose that he has 28 blocks. His mother puts him with his 28 blocks into a room at the beginning of the day. At the end of the day, being curious, she counts the blocks very carefully, and discovers a phenomenal law – no matter what he does with the blocks, there are always 28 remaining! This continues for a number of days, until one day there are only 27 blocks, but a little investigating shows that there is one under the rug – she must look everywhere to be sure that the number of blocks has not changed. One day, however, the number appears to change – there are only 26 blocks. Careful investigation indicates that the window was open, and upon looking outside, the other two blocks are found. Another day, careful count indicates that there are 30 blocks! This causes considerable consternation, until it is realized that Bruce came to visit, bringing his blocks with him, and he left a few at Dennis' house. After she has disposed of the extra blocks, she closes the window, does not let Bruce in, and then everything is going along all right, until one time she counts and finds only 25 blocks.
However, there is a box in the room, a toy box, and the mother goes to open the toy box, but the boy says
No, do not open my toy box, and screams. Mother is not allowed to open the toy box. Being extremely curious, and somewhat ingenious, she invents a scheme! She knows that a block weighs three ounces, so she weighs the box at a time when she sees 28 blocks, and it weighs 16 ounces. The next time she wishes to check, she weighs the box again, subtracts sixteen ounces and divides by three. She discovers the following:
Number of blocks seen + weight of box — 16 ounces3 ounces = constant
There then appear to be some new deviations, but careful study indicates that the dirty water in the bathtub is changing its level. The child is throwing blocks into the water, and she cannot see them because it is so dirty, but she can find out how many blocks are in the water by adding another term to her formula. Since the original height of the water was 6 inches and each block raises the water a quarter of an inch, this new formula would be:
Number of blocks seen + weight of box — 16 ounces3 ounces + height of water — 6 inches1/4 inch = constant
In the gradual increase in the complexity of her world, she finds a whole series of terms representing ways of calculating how many blocks are in places where she is not allowed to look. As a result, she finds a complex formula, a quantity which has to be computed, which always stays the same in her situation.
What is the analogy of this to the conservation of energy? The most remarkable aspect that must be abstracted from this picture is that there are no blocks. Take away the first terms in [the equations ] and we find ourselves calculating more or less abstract things. The analogy has the following points. First, when we are calculating the energy, sometimes some of it leaves the system and goes away, or sometimes some comes in. In order to verify the conservation of energy, we must be careful that we have not put any in or taken any out. Second, the energy has a large number of different forms, and there is a formula for each one. These are: gravitational energy, kinetic energy, heat energy, elastic energy, electrical energy, chemical energy, radiant energy, nuclear energy, mass energy. If we total up the formulas for each of these contributions, it will not change except for energy going in and out.
It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge of what energy is. We do not have a picture that energy comes in little blobs of a definite amount. It is not that way. However, there are formulas for calculating some numerical quantity, and when we add it all together it gives
28 – always the same number. It is an abstract thing in that it does not tell us the mechanism or the reasons for the various formulas.