Up next
Radioactivity illustrative animations
This resource contains 4 different animations to aid in the teaching of radioactivity.
Practical Activity for 14-16
The purpose of this collection of resources is to support the teaching of ionizing radiation in school and, in particular, to encourage teachers to use practical activities. The guidance and advice on setting up and managing activities includes the use of the spark counter, the Geiger-Müller tube, and the diffusion cloud chamber. The videos were produced in collaboration with CLEAPSS and all of the activities can be carried out safely in schools.
How to use this collection of resources:
Introduction to teaching radioactivity
Useful links:
This resource contains 4 different animations to aid in the teaching of radioactivity.
These 4 animations will aid in the teaching of radioactivity.
Radiation Ionises the Air
The Cloud Chamber
The Spark Counter
The Properties of Alpha, Beta and Gamma
This demonstration uses a radioactive source to produce radiation that will ionise the air and complete a circuit to charge an electroscope.
Demonstration
A radioactive source produces radiation that will ionise the air. The conducting air completes a circuit to charge an electroscope. Use the circuit to show the ionising effect of the radiation and present it as a means of detecting ionising radiation.
Apparatus and Materials
Health & Safety and Technical Notes
See guidance note on
Managing radioactive materials in schools
A school EHT supply is limited to a maximum current of 5 mA. which is regarded as safe. For use with a spark counter, the 50 MΩ. safety resistor can be left in circuit so reducing the maximum shock current to less than 0.1 mA. Although the school EHT supply is safe, shocks can make the demonstrator jump. It is therefore wise to see that there are no bare high voltage conductors; use female 4 mm connectors where required.
Read our standard health & safety guidance
A web cam or ‘flexicam’ could be used to project an image of the electroscope's gold leaf onto a screen. Alternatively, use a bright lamp to cast a shadow of the leaf on a screen or wall.
The advantage of using an EHT is that it looks like an electric circuit – albeit a strange one. The electroscope plays the part of very sensitive meter and the air between the plates is a component whose resistance changes.
Take care when using the electroscope not to make it all seem like a sleight of hand – especially when moving leads around.
Radium is a source of alpha, beta and gamma radiation however the beta and gamma radiation do not cause enough ionisation of the air to start a spark.
Procedure
Setting up
Teaching Notes
This experiment was safety-tested in May 2007
This demonstration is a highly visible way of showing and counting ionisation of the air caused by alpha radiation.
Demonstration
The spark counter is a highly visible (and audible) way of showing and counting ionisation of the air caused by alpha radiation (or a match). It is a useful step towards understanding the Geiger-Müller tube.
Apparatus and Materials
Health & Safety and Technical Notes
See guidance note on...
Managing radioactive materials in schools
A school EHT supply is limited to a maximum current of 5 mA., which is regarded as safe. For use with a spark counter, the 50 MΩ safety resistor can be left in the circuit so reducing the maximum shock current to less than 0.1 mA..
Although the school EHT supply is safe, shocks can make the demonstrator jump. It is therefore wise to see that there are no bare high voltage conductors; use female 4 mm connectors where required.
Read our standard health & safety guidance
The spark counter is a special piece of apparatus (see image above). It consists of a metal gauze with a wire running underneath. Philip Harris calls it a Spark Discharge Apparatus.
Procedure
Setting up
Carrying out
Teaching Notes
This experiment was safety-tested in June 2007
This is a general introduction to the Geiger-Müller (G-M) tube describing and explaining the basic principles of its operation.
Demonstration
This is a general introduction to the Geiger-Müller (G-M) tube describing and explaining the basic principles of its operation.
Apparatus and Materials
Health & Safety and Technical Notes
See guidance notes:
Geiger-Müller tubes are set up to operate at a voltage within their ‘plateau’. In self-contained systems, this is set automatically.
The voltage across a Geiger-Müller tube is generally kept low enough so as not to produce a roaring
spark when an energetic particle enters it.
Geiger-Müller tubes are very delicate, especially if they are designed to measure alpha particles. The thin, mica window allows alpha particles to enter the chamber. It needs a protective cover to prevent it from being accidentally damaged by being touched. A good alpha detecting Geiger-Müller tube will also count photons. If you light a match in front of it, a few ultra violet photons will be detected.
Procedure
Setting up
This will depend on the type of Geiger-Müller tube you are using. If you have a self-contained system, then simply get it ready and switch it on. If you are using an older style Geiger-Müller tube that plugs into a separate ratemeter or scaler, you will need to set the voltage on the scaler. Do this by following these steps.
Carrying out the demonstration
Teaching Notes
This experiment was safety-tested in August 2007
The Taylor diffusion cloud chamber is a simple piece of equipment which will clearly show alpha particle tracks. It is cheap enough to allow students, in groups, the opportunity to do their own experiment.
Class practical
The Taylor diffusion cloud chamber is a simple piece of equipment which will clearly show alpha particle tracks. It is cheap enough to allow students, in groups, the opportunity to do their own experiment. Students are fascinated by the tracks and watch them for a long time. This is something to be enjoyed and not hurried.
You can do this as a demonstration. However, students will prefer waiting for their own apparatus to produce results rather than yours. Also, if you have eight to ten groups of students, each with their own cloud chambers, you are more likely to get some results sooner or later.
Apparatus and Materials
For each student or student group:
Available to the class/teacher:
Health & Safety and Technical Notes
This demonstration uses a weak radioactive source. If any radioactive paint has flaked off the source inside the chamber, do NOT use it.
Since ethanol is in use, there must be no naked flames in the room.
Wear eye protection and gauntlet-style leather gloves when making or handling solid carbon dioxide.
Read our standard health & safety guidance
Alternative radioactive source for the diffusion cloud chamber
Procedure
Teaching Notes
This experiment was safety-tested in August 2007
This demonstration focuses on the properties of alpha particles. It follows on closely from the experiment Identifying the three types of ionising radiation.
Demonstration
This demonstration focuses on the properties of alpha particles. It follows on closely from the experiment Identifying the three types of ionising radiation.
Apparatus and Materials
Health & Safety and Technical Notes
See guidance note on...
Managing radioactive materials in schools
A school EHT supply is limited to a maximum current of 5 mA., which is regarded as safe. For use with a spark counter, the 50 MΩ. safety resistor can be left in the circuit. This reduces the maximum shock current to less than 0.1 mA..
Although the school EHT supply is safe, shocks can make the demonstrator jump. It is therefore wise to see that there are no bare high voltage conductors. Use female 4 mm connectors where required. Read our standard health & safety guidance...
Read our standard health & safety guidance
Note that 5μCi is equivalent to 185 kBq.
Sealed sources for radium and plutonium are no longer available. However, if you have them in your school, you can use them as long as you follow your school safety policy and local rules.
If you do not have a pure alpha source ( 239 Pu), you need to be careful about trying to show the properties of alpha using a Geiger-Müller tube. The radiation from a mixed source like 241 Am can penetrate aluminium and has a long range. This is because it gives out gamma as well as alpha radiation:
Radioactive sources: isotopes, radiation and availability
The most effective way of demonstrating the properties of alpha radiation is to use the spark counter. If you do not have a pure alpha source (i.e. you are using radium or americium-241), this is the recommended method because the spark counter does not respond to beta or gamma radiation:
The Geiger-Müller tubes are very delicate, especially if they are designed to measure alpha particles. The thin, mica window needs a protective cover so that it is not accidentally damaged by being touched.
Education suppliers stock a set of absorbers that range from tissue paper to thick lead. This is a useful piece of equipment to have in your prep room. You can make up your own set. This should include: tissue paper, plain paper, some thin metal foil (e.g. cigarette paper, wrapping from a chocolate from an assortment box, and a small piece of gold leaf}.
Teaching Notes
Alpha particle tracks bent in a very strong magnetic field
The deflection is too small to measure in the school laboratory, but shows that they have a positive charge. The small deflection shows that they have a relatively large mass. Collisions with helium produce 90° forks showing that they have the same mass as a helium (nucleus). You can say that "alpha particles are thought to be a doubly ionized helium atom"Alpha particle tracks including a collision with a helium nucleus
If the students have already met the idea of nuclei, then you can call alpha particles a helium nucleus.This experiment was safety-tested in August 2006
This demonstration focuses on the properties of beta particles. It follows on closely from Identifying the three types of ionising radiation.
Demonstration
This demonstration focuses on the properties of beta particles. It follows on closely from Identifying the three types of ionising radiation.
Apparatus and Materials
Health & Safety and Technical Notes
See guidance note on Managing radioactive materials in schools...
Managing radioactive materials in schools
This experiment puts the demonstrator at a small risk of receiving a dose of β radiation. The demonstrator should avoid leaning over the source and, if it cannot be avoided, should reduce the exposure time as far as possible. There are safer versions of doing this experiment which use a collimated beam and much smaller magnets.
Note that 5 μCi is equivalent to 185 kBq.
Geiger-Müller tubes are very delicate, especially if they are designed to measure alpha particles. The thin, mica window needs a protective cover so that it is not accidentally damaged by being touched.
Some education suppliers now stock all-in-one Geiger-Müller tubes with a counter.
Education suppliers stock a set of absorbers that range from tissue paper to thick lead. This is a useful piece of equipment to have in your prep room. You can make up your own set. This should include: tissue paper, plain paper, some thin metal foil (e.g. cigarette paper, wrapping from a chocolate from an assortment box and a small piece of gold leaf).
To cut off the direct path in step 4, the lead block from the absorbers kit is just adequate but a block with a bigger area is better.
Procedure
Absorption of beta radiation
Teaching Notes
This experiment was safety-tested in April 2006.
This demonstration focuses on the properties of beta particles.
You can show that beta radiation is deflected in a magnetic field; this is an impressive and striking demonstration.
Demonstration
This demonstration focuses on the properties of beta particles. It follows closely from
Identifying the three types of ionizing radiation
You can show that beta radiation is deflected in a magnetic field; this is an impressive and striking demonstration.
Apparatus and Materials
Health & Safety and Technical Notes
This experiment puts the demonstrator at a small risk of receiving a dose of β radiation. The demonstrator should avoid leaning over the source and, if it cannot be avoided, should reduce the exposure time as far as possible. There are safer versions of doing this experiment which use a collimated beam and much smaller magnets.
Read our standard health & safety guidance
Note that 5 μCi is equivalent to 185 kBq
Geiger-Müller tubes are very delicate, especially if they are designed to measure alpha particles. The thin, mica window needs a protective cover so that it is not accidentally damaged by being touched.
You need to be especially careful handling the Geiger-Müller tube near the Eclipse magnet, which is extremely strong. The strong magnet can pull the Geiger-Müller tube out of a loose holder or even your fingers. Make sure that the Geiger-Müller tube is firmly fixed in a retort stand which is clamped to the bench before you start setting up the magnet.
Some education suppliers now stock all-in-one Geiger-Müller tubes with a counter. See
Education suppliers stock a set of absorbers that range from tissue paper to thick lead. This is a useful piece of equipment to have in your prep room. You can make up your own set. This should include: tissue paper, plain paper, some thin metal foil (e.g. cigarette wrapping from a chocolate from an assortment box, and a small piece of gold leaf.
To cut off the direct path in step 4 , the lead block from the absorbers kit is just adequate, but a block with a bigger area is better.
Procedure
Teaching Notes
This experiment was safety-tested in August 2007
This demonstration focuses on the properties of gamma radiation. You can show that it is much more penetrating than alpha or beta radiation and has a much longer range.
Demonstration
This demonstration focuses on the properties of gamma radiation. You can show that it is much more penetrating than alpha or beta radiation and has a much longer range.
Apparatus and Materials
Health & Safety and Technical Notes
See guidance notes on...
Managing radioactive materials in schools
Read our standard health & safety guidance
Note that 5 μ Ci is equivalent to 185 kBq.
Cobalt-60 is the best gamma source. However, you may have a sealed radium source in your school. This gives out alpha, beta and gamma radiation. You can use it for this experiment by putting a thick aluminium shield in front of it. This will cut out the alpha and beta radiations.
An alternative is to try using a Geiger-Muller tube sideways. The gamma radiation will pass through the sides of the tube but alpha and beta radiation will not. Some gamma particles interact with the tube wall and knock electrons into the tube gas, where they are detected. This effect enhances the detection efficiency of the gamma particles. You can do a quick check by doubling and tripling the distance between the source and the axis of the Geiger-Muller tube and seeing if the count follows an inverse square law (by dropping to a quarter and a ninth).
Some education suppliers now stock all-in-one Geiger-Muller tubes with a counter. See e.g.
Education suppliers stock a set of absorbers that range from tissue paper to thick lead. This is a useful piece of equipment to have in your prep room. You can make up your own set. This should include: tissue paper, plain paper, some thin metal foil (e.g. cigarette paper, wrapping from a chocolate from an assortment box and a small piece of gold leaf}
Procedure
Teaching Notes
This experiment was safety-tested in August 2007
Gamma radiation is part of the electromagnetic spectrum. It is not absorbed by the air, but its intensity decreases because it spreads out. Therefore, the intensity varies with the inverse square of distance: it follows an inverse square law.
Demonstration
Gamma radiation is part of the electromagnetic spectrum. It is not absorbed by the air, but its intensity decreases because it spreads out. Therefore, the intensity varies with the inverse square of distance: it follows an inverse square law. You can show this in the laboratory and use it as evidence to support the fact that gamma radiation is a part of the electromagnetic spectrum.
Apparatus and Materials
Health & Safety and Technical Notes
See guidance notes on...
Managing radioactive materials in schools
Read our standard health & safety guidance
Note that 5 μCi is equivalent to 185 kBq.
Cobalt-60 is the best pure gamma source. However, you may have a sealed radium source in your school. This gives out alpha, beta and gamma radiation. You can use it for this experiment by putting a thick aluminium shield in front of it. This will cut out the alpha and beta radiations.
An alternative is to try using a Geiger-Muller tube sideways. The gamma radiation will pass through the sides of the tube but alpha and beta will not. You can do a quick check by doubling and tripling the distance between the source and the axis of Geiger-Muller tube and seeing if the count follows an inverse square law (by dropping to a quarter and a ninth).
Using the Geiger-Muller tube sideways has an added advantage that you have an accurate measure of where the distance is zero. It is along the axis of the tube.
Education suppliers stock a set of absorbers ranging from tissue paper to thick lead. This is a useful piece of equipment to have in your prep room. You can make up your own set. This should include: tissue paper, plain paper, some thin metal foil (e.g. cigarette paper, wrapping from a chocolate from an assortment box and a small piece of gold leaf}
Procedure
Setting up...
Teaching Notes
This experiment was safety-tested in May 2006
Measuring the half-life of a radioactive isotope brings some of the wonder of radioactive decay into the school laboratory. Students can witness one element turning into another and hear (or see) the decrease in the radiation it gives out as it transmutes.
Demonstration
Measuring the half-life of a radioactive isotope brings some of the wonder of radioactive decay into the school laboratory. Students can witness one element turning into another and hear (or see) the decrease in the radiation it gives out as it transmutes.
This demonstration uses a protactinium generator
to show the exponential decay of protactinium-234, a grand-daughter of uranium. It has a half-life of just over a minute, which gives students the chance to measure and analyze the decay in a single lesson.
Apparatus and Materials
Health & Safety and Technical Notes
See the following guidance note:
Managing radioactive materials in schools
To limit the risk of radioactive liquids being spilt, there should be special instructions in the local rules for handling (and preparing) this source.
Read our standard health & safety guidance
Preparation of the protactinium generator
It is now possible to purchase the chemicals already made up in a sealed bottle. One supplier is TAAB Laboratories Equipment Ltd, 3 Minerva House, Calleva Park, Aldermaston, RG7 8NA. Tel: 0118 9817775. However, you can make your own if you prefer.
These quantities make a total volume of 20 cm3. You can scale them up if you have a larger bottle. (A '30 ml' bottle has a capacity of about 35 ml, so there is still room to shake the solution when the total volume is 30 ml.)
Once you have made the protactinium generator, you can store it with other radioactive materials, taking care to follow your school code of practice and local rules: see the Managing radioactive materials in schools guidance note:
Managing radioactive materials in schools
A polypropylene bottle is preferable to polythene because it is somewhat more resistant to attack by the acid and ketone. Nevertheless, polythene bottles can be used, provided no attempt is made to store the liquid in them for more than a few weeks.
The organic layer which separates out contains the protactinium-234. This decays with a half-life of about 70 seconds.
An alternative to protactinium: A new, effective and extremely low hazard system for measuring half-life is available from Cooknell Electronics Ltd, Weymouth, DT4 9TJ. This uses fabric gas mantles designed for camping lights. Each mantle contains a small quantity of radioactive thorium. More details are available on the Cooknell Electronics website:
Procedure
time of dayfor the sample.
Teaching Notes
The chemistry of the experiment:
Table of count rate: Get the students to make a table of count rate against time, and correct it for background count. The first 10-second reading should be allocated to a time of zero.
Plot a graph: Get the students to plot a graph of count rate against time. They should draw a smooth curve through the points.
How Science Works extension This experiment provides an opportunity to assess the accuracy of the measured half-life value and how the random nature of decay affects the answer.
The accepted value for the half-life of protactinium is about 70 seconds.
Explore different ways in which a half-life value can be obtained from this apparatus:
For example, ask: "how does the random nature of the decay affect the measured count-rate when the count is low, or high, compared the background count?"
Radioactive materials raise significant safety issues, providing an opportunity to discuss the value and use of secondary data sources.
This experiment was safety-tested in February 2007
In this activity, students model radioactive decay using coins and dice.
Class practical
In this activity, students model radioactive decay using coins and dice. By relating the results from the model to the experimental results in...
Measuring the half-life of protactinium
...students can see that the model helps to explain the way in which a radioactive substance decays. The model provides an insight into what might be happening within radioactive atoms.
This activity is a good analogy of radioactive decay as it is based on probability. The decaying trend will be noticeable and so too will the random nature.
Apparatus and Materials
Health & Safety and Technical Notes
Read our standard health & safety guidance
The more coins each student has, the better the analogy of radioactive decay. You could use as few as one per student to keep it simple. Any more than four is quite difficult to manage.
Small coins will turn around more in their cupped hands.
A canvas bag containing 500 plastic cubes (each side 10 mm), each with one face identified, is available in the UK from Lascells, order code 60-010.
Procedure
Teaching Notes
decay. As there are fewer of them each time, fewer will decay.
atom.
This experiment was safety-tested in May 2007
Teacher guidance on the legislating and regulations governing radioactive materials in schools
Countries have national laws to control how radioactive materials are acquired, used and disposed of. These laws follow internationally agreed principles of radiological protection.
The following principles apply to schools:
Generally, school employers will insist you obtain their permission before acquiring new radioactive sources.
You must follow your employer’s safety guidance relating to the use the radioactive sources. Most school employers will require you to use either SSERC or CLEAPSS safety guidance, as follows:
In Scotland, safety guidance for use of radioactive sources in schools is issued by the Scottish Schools Equipment Research Centre (SSERC) and is available to members through their website.
In the rest of the UK and British Isles Crown Dependencies, guidance is available from CLEAPSS, the School Science Service. Their guidance document, L93, is freely available from their website, even to non-members.
In the UK...
Updated October 2008
The following summarizes the somewhat complicated legislative framework in which schools are expected to work with radioactive sources in the UK. However, teachers do not need to obtain and study this legislation; this has been done by CLEAPSS and SSERC, and it is incorporated into their guidance in plain English.
In the European Union, member states have implemented the 1996 EU Basic Safety Standards Directive (as amended) that in turn reflects the 1990 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations. In the UK, this has been done through the Radioactive Substances Act 1993 (RSA93), which controls the security, acquisition and disposal of radioactive material, and the Ionising Radiations Regulations 1999 (IRR99) which controls the use of radioactive material by employers. Transport of radioactive material is controlled by The Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Use of Transportable Pressure Equipment Regulations 2007.
There are exemptions from parts of the RSA93 and schools can make use of The Radioactive Substances (Schools etc.) Exemption Order 1963, The Radioactive Substances (Prepared Uranium and Thorium Compounds) Exemption Order 1962, and others. These exemption orders are conditional and to make use of them and avoid costly registration with the Environment Agency (or SEPA in Scotland, or the Environment and Heritage Service in Northern Ireland) you must adhere to the conditions. Note that currently, these exemption orders are being reviewed.
The way in which these laws are implemented in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland varies. The Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) has withdrawn its guidance AM 1/92, and the associated regulations requiring this have been repealed. Consequently, purchase of radioactive sources by maintained schools in England is no longer regulated by the DCSF. The DCSF commissioned CLEAPSS to prepare and issue ‘Managing Ionising Radiations and Radioactive Substances in Schools, etc L93’ (September 2008) and has commended it to schools in England. Similar regulations relating to other educational institutions in the UK have not changed; English institutions for further education remain regulated through the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills. Similarly, schools in Wales should follow the guidance from the Welsh Assembly Government Department for Children, Education, Lifelong Learning and Skills. Schools in Scotland should follow the guidance from the Scottish Government Education Directorate and associated guidance issued by SSERC. Schools in Northern Ireland should follow the guidance from the Department of Education Northern Ireland (DENI). The Crown Dependencies Jersey, Guernsey and Isle of Man are not part of the UK and schools and colleges should follow the guidance from their own internal government departments responsible for education.
In the UK, if an employer carries out a practice with sources of ionising radiations, including work with radionuclides that exceed specified activities (which is 100 kBq for Co-60, and 10 kBq for Sr-90, Ra-226, Th-232, Am-241 and Pu-239), the practice must be regulated according to the IRR99 and the employer must consult with a Radiation Protection Adviser (RPA). Since 2005, the RPA must hold a certificate of competence recognized by the Health and Safety Executive. Education employers are unlikely to have staff with this qualification, so the RPA will usually be an external consultant. Education employers need to notify the HSE 28 days before first starting work with radioactive sources. This is centralized at the HSE’s East Grinstead office.
Note: For higher risk work with radioactive material, the IRR99 requires designated areas, called controlled areas and supervised areas, to be set up if special procedures are needed to restrict significant exposure – special means more than normal laboratory good practice. It should never be necessary for a school to designate an area as controlled, and only in special circumstances would it be necessary to designate an area as supervised. The normal use of school science radioactive sources, including the use of school science half-life sources, does not need a supervised or controlled area.
Sources that become waste because they are no longer in a safe condition, or are no longer working satisfactorily, or are of a type unsuitable for school science, should be disposed of. In England and Wales, the Environment Agency has produced a guidance document through CLEAPSS that explains the available disposal routes. Similarly, SSERC has produced guidance for schools in Scotland. Schools in Northern Ireland should refer to DENI.
See the health and safety notes in each experiment. This is general guidance.
Health and safety in school and college science affects all concerned: teachers and technicians, their employers, students, their parents or guardians, and authors and publishers. These guidelines refer to procedures in the UK. If you are working in another country you may need to make alternative provision.
Teaching guidance on different methods of making dry ice.
Solid carbon dioxide is known as dry ice. It sublimes at –78°C becoming an extremely cold gas. It is often used in theatres or nightclubs to produce clouds (looking a bit like smoke). Because it is denser than the air, it stays low. It cools the air and causes water vapour in the air to condense into tiny droplets – hence the clouds.
It is also useful in the physics (and chemistry) laboratory.
The Institute of Physics has kindly produced this video to explain how dry ice is formed.
Dry ice can be dangerous if it is not handled properly. Wear eye protection and gauntlet-style leather gloves when making or handling solid carbon dioxide.
Dry ice has many uses. As well as simply watching it sublime, you could also use it for cloud chambers, dry ice pucks, and cooling thermistors and metal wire resistors in resistance experiments. It can also be used in experiments related to the gas laws.
There are two main methods of getting dry ice.
It is possible to make the solid snow
by expansion before the lesson begins and to store it in a wide-necked Thermos flask.
Remember that the first production of solid carbon dioxide from the cylinder may not produce very much, because the cylinder and its attachments have to cool down.
What type of cylinder, where do I get CO2 , and what will it cost?
A CO2 gas cylinder should be fitted with a dip tube (this is also called a ‘siphon type’ cylinder). This enables you to extract from the cylinder bottom so that you get CO2 in its liquid form, not the vapour.
NOTE: A plain black finish to the cylinder indicates that it will supply vapour from above the liquid. A cylinder with two white stripes, diametrically opposite, indicates it has a siphon tube and is suitable for making dry ice. A cylinder from British Oxygen will cost about £80 per year for cylinder hire and about £40 each time you need to get it filled up. (The refill charge can be reduced by having your chemistry department cylinders filled up at the same time.)
Don't be tempted to get a small cylinder, it will run out too quickly.
If the school has its own CO2 cylinder there will be no hire charge, but you will need to have it checked from time to time (along with fire extinguisher checks). Your local fire station or their suppliers may prove a good source for refills.
CLEAPSS leaflet PS45 Refilling CO2 cylinders provides a list of suppliers of CO2.
A dry ice attachment for the cylinder
Dry ice disks can be made using an attachment that fits directly on to a carbon dioxide cylinder with a siphon tube. Section 13.3.1 of the CLEAPSS Laboratory Handbook explains the use of this attachment (sometimes called Snowpacks or Jetfreezers). This form is most useful for continuous cloud chambers and low-friction pucks.
You can buy a Snowpack dry ice maker from Scientific and Chemical. The product number is GFT070010.
Blocks of solid carbon dioxide or granulated versions of it can be obtained fairly easily with a search on the Internet. Local stage supply shops or Universities may be able to help. It usually comes in expanded foam packing; you can keep it in this packing in a deep freeze for a few days.
The dry ice pellets come in quite large batches. However, they have a number of uses in science lessons so it is worth trying to co-ordinate the activities of different teachers to make best use of your bulk purchase.
Teaching Guidance for 14-16 16-19
Health and safety in school and college science affects all concerned: teachers and technicians, their employers, students, their parents or guardians, as well as authors and publishers. These guidelines refer to procedures in the United Kingdom. If you are working in another country you may need to make alternative provision.
See the health and safety notes in each experiment. This is general guidance.
As part of the reviewing process, the experiments on this website have been checked for health and safety. In particular, we have attempted to ensure that:
It is assumed that:
Under the Health and Safety at Work Act and related Regulations, UK employers are responsible for making a risk assessment before hazardous procedures are undertaken or hazardous materials are used. Teachers are required to co-operate with their employers by complying with such risk assessments. However, teachers should be aware that mistakes can be made and, in any case, different employers adopt different standards.
Therefore, before carrying out any practical activity, teachers should always check that what they are proposing is compatible with their employer’s risk assessments and does not need modification for their particular circumstances. Any rules or restrictions issued by the employer must always be followed, whatever is recommended here. However, far less is banned by employers than is commonly supposed. Be aware that some activities, such as the use of radioactive material, have particular regulations that must be followed.
Model (general) risk assessments have been taken from, or are compatible with:
Clearly, you must follow whatever procedures for risk assessment your employers have laid down. As far as we know, almost all the practical work and demonstrations on this website are covered by the model (general) risk assessments detailed in the above publications, and so, in most schools and colleges, you will not need to take further action, other than to consider whether any customisation is necessary for the particular circumstances of your school or class.
Only you can know when your school or college needs a special risk assessment. But thereafter, the responsibility for taking all the steps demanded by the regulations lies with your employer.
The Institute of Physics are not responsible for the content of external websites which may be linked from this website's pages.
Teaching guidance covering the different isotopes that may be available in your school.
In the UK, education suppliers stock only these three isotopes in sealed sources:
cobalt-60 | pure gamma (provided the low energy betas are filtered out) |
strontium-90 | pure beta |
americium-241 | alpha and some gamma |
They are shown with the radiations that they emit.
However, you may have other sources in your school or Local Authority and, as long as you follow your school safety policy and local rules, you can use these in schools. The ones that are useful for practical work are:
radium-226 | alpha, beta and gamma |
plutonium-239 | pure alpha |
caesium-137 | beta, then gamma (from its decay product, metastable Ba-137) |
For safety information:
Teaching guidance on the use of an electroscope.
A gold leaf electroscope measures potential difference between the leaf and the base (or earth).
The leaf rises because it is repelled by the stem (support). The leaf and its support have the same type of charge. A typical school electroscope will show a deflection for a charge as small as 0.01 pC (the unit pC is a pico coulomb, 1 × 10-12 coulombs, equivalent to the charge on over 6 million electrons).
There are a number of ways of charging an electroscope. They include:
Charging by contact. Rub an insulator to charge it up. Then stroke it across the top plate of the electroscope. This will transfer charge from the insulator to the electroscope. This method is direct and clear to students. However, the charge left on the electroscope will not always leave it fully deflected.
Charging by induction. This is a quick way to get a larger charge onto the electroscope. However, it can look a bit magical to students. So it should be used with some care.
Rub an insulator to charge it up. Bring it close to the top plate of the electroscope – but don’t let it touch. This will induce the opposite charge on the plate of electroscope leaving a net charge on the gold leaf, which will rise. Now touch the plate with you finger momentarily to earth it (still holding the charged insulator near the top plate). The charge on the top plate will be neutralised but there will still be a charge on the gold leaf. Let go of the plate and then take the charged insulator away. The charge that had been pushed down to the gold leaf will now redistribute itself over the plate and the leaf, leaving the whole thing charged. The leaf will show a good deflection.
Charging with an EHT or Van de Graaff generator. You can use a flying lead connected to one of these high voltage sources to charge up the gold leaf electroscope. This is quick, effective and obvious to students. The other terminal of the supply should be earthed. Connect the flying lead to the supply through a safety resistor.
The electroscope can be used to demonstrate that a small current is flowing in a circuit – for example in experiments to show the ionisation of the air.
Using the hook rather than the plate makes the electroscope more sensitive to small amounts of charge. A charge of around 0.01 pC will cause a noticeable deflection of the gold leaf. So it is possible to watch it rise (or fall) slowly due to a current as small as 1 pA.
Put the electroscope in series (as though it were an ammeter). Any charge that flows in the circuit will move onto the electroscope making the gold leaf rise. You may need to discharge the electroscope when you first switch on the power supply because there will be an initial movement of charge due to the capacitance in the circuit.
Alternatively, you can use the electroscope as a source of charge and watch it discharge. It is like a capacitor with its own display. Charge it up and then connect it into a circuit. If the circuit conducts, the electroscope (capacitor) will discharge and, at the same time, the leaf will display how much charge is left.
The electroscope has a very high (as good as infinite) resistance. If you earth the electroscope case, the electroscope measures potential so it is well suited to detecting potentials in electrostatic experiments. Without earthing, the quantity it is measuring is charge. This is related to p.d. (by its capacitance C , i.e. V = Q/C ). But it isn’t the same as p.d. because the capacitance can vary a lot – even during an experiment. Capacitance depends on the position of the electroscope, people nearby and so on.
So although the electroscope is useful as an indication of a voltage, it isn’t a reliable means of measuring it.
School electroscopes are open to the air (more refined ones are in a vacuum). Cosmic radiation will ionise this air and cause a small leakage current. So the electroscope will discharge over time. Historically, the discharging of electroscopes led to the suggestion of the existence of cosmic radiation. Victor Hess and Carl Anderson shared the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1936, for discoveries related to cosmic radiation. The Nobel Award ceremony speech describes their work:
Teaching guidance on the models students may have of the atom and how this may develop.
As students start experiments on ionisation, they will have a fairly basic model of atoms and molecules, as portrayed by the simple kinetic theory. They will know that solids, liquids and gases are made up of atoms and molecules. They may think of these as round blobs with no internal structure. These particles exert attractions on each other at short ranges of approach and, necessarily, repulsions at very short range. They bounce off each other in elastic collisions (energy stored kinetically is conserved) – more advanced students may understand that this is because the forces are the same on the way in as they are on the way out.
They will have heard of ions – probably in the context of chemical reactions, solutions and electrical conductivity. However, using ions to explain sparks may be a new idea. Ionisation and sparks show that electrons are easily knocked off neutral atoms and molecules. In these collisions, energy is not conserved – some of it is lost to remove the electrons. So the collisions are inelastic. This shows that the energies needed to remove electrons are of the order of the energy of a very fast moving particle (a few 100 m/s).
Their picture of the atom will develop. They will learn that it contains electrons, which are fairly easily detached. There must also be some positive material, probably holding most of the mass of the atom. The atom is held together in some unknown way.
Teaching guidance explaining how clouds form.
Clouds form in the atmosphere when warm, wet air is pushed up. As the air goes higher its pressure decreases and it gets colder. The colder air cannot contain so much water vapour and the air becomes supersaturated with vapour. Given the right conditions, some of the vapour condenses to form water droplets in a cloud.
The droplets need something to form around. An extremely small droplet of just a few molecules cannot form a cloud all by itself. Its molecules would escape from each other again. If the air contains attractive particles (usually minute particles of salt) that the water can wet, a droplet will start to form. The salt particles serve as condensation nuclei on which larger drops can grow.
A similar process is put to use in a cloud chamber containing alcohol vapour. Ions in the air can serve as excellent condensation nuclei. The alcohol molecules are electrically ‘oblong’ with positive and negative charges at the ends, so they can cluster easily around a charged particle. The other small particles can be cleared out. This stops droplets forming into unwanted clouds (even when the air is supersaturated). Instead, the droplets form on the trail of ions left behind by ionising radiation, typically an alpha particle.
Teaching guidance on Alpha-particle tracks in a cloud chamber.
Nuclear bullets
from radioactive atoms make the tracks in a cloud chamber. They hurtle through the air, wet
with alcohol vapour, detaching an electron from atom after atom, leaving a trail of ions in their path. Tiny drops of alcohol can easily form on these ions to mark the trail.
The trail of ions is made up of some ‘air molecules’ that have lost an electron (leaving them with a positive charge) and some that have picked up the freed electrons, giving them a negative charge.
There is no sighting of the particle which caused the ionisation, because it has left the ‘scene’ before the condensation happens. If you count the number of droplets an alpha particle might produce 100,000 pairs of ions by pulling an electron from 100,000 atoms.
When the alpha particle has lost all its energy in collisions with the ‘air molecules’ it stops moving and is absorbed.
Teaching guidance on evidence for the hollow atom.
The main and first evidence for the hollow atom came from...
Rutherford's alpha scattering experiment
However, the first evidence students see for a hollow-atom often comes from cloud-chamber photographs. Although this may be historically back to front, it is reasonable to use the cloud chamber photographs as the first indication that atoms are mainly empty.
Rutherford had devised his model of a nuclear atom by 1910, before alpha particle tracks were photographed in cloud chambers (c1911). However, Rutherford and Wilson worked in the same laboratory so it is likely that Rutherford had seen tracks in cloud chambers.
The evidence provided by cloud chamber photographs and the inferences that can be made are extremely useful whether you present them as preparation for the Rutherford model or follow-up support for it.
Most of the time there is just a straight track produced when an alpha particle passes through the cloud-chamber, producing ions. Mostly, these ions are produced by inelastic collisions with electrons in neutral particles. An alpha particle will have around 100,000 inelastic collisions before it no longer has energy stored kinetically. The number of collisions shows that electrons are easily removed.
The straightness of the tracks shows that:
Therefore, in all of these 100 million collisions with atoms, the alpha particles never hit anything with significant mass. So most of the atom is empty.
However, students will see photographs that show large deflections of alpha particles. These are rare events (requiring thousands of photographs to be taken). They show that:
The hollowness of the atom is treated more quantitatively in the Rutherford scattering experiment. In this, 99.99% of the alpha particles are undeflected. This gives an indication of how tightly the positive charge of the nucleus is packed together.
There are some experiments which must be done in semi-darkness, for example, optics experiments and ripple tanks. You need to plan carefully for such lessons. Ensure that students are clear about what they need to do during such activities and they are not given unnecessary time. Keep an eye on what is going on in the class, and act quickly to dampen down any inappropriate behaviour before it gets out of hand.
Shadows on the ceiling will reveal movements that are not in your direct line of sight.
Students' models of each of the radiations will develop through this topic. They will start with an idea of a generalized invisible radiation. As they see more evidence for the nature of the radiations, their model will become more sophisticated.
Students' models of each of the radiations will develop through this topic. They will start with an idea of a generalized invisible radiation. As they see more evidence for the nature of the radiations, their model will become more sophisticated. This will be reflected in the developing language that you use to describe the radiations:
Eventually, the properties and nature of alpha, beta and gamma radiations can be summarized as follows.
alpha | beta | gamma | |
property | highly ionising | fairly ionising | weakly ionising (depends on intensity) |
short range in air (3 to 5 cm) | medium range in air (~15 cm) | long range (inverse square law) | |
stopped by paper | stopped by lead or thick aluminium | attenuated by thick lead | |
deflected slightly in magnetic field | deflected in magnetic field | Undeflected in electric and magnetic fields | |
deflected in electric field | deflected in electric field | ||
nature | positive charge | negative charge | no charge |
large mass (same as helium nucleus) | small mass | ||
identity | helium nucleus | fast moving electron | high frequency electromagnetic wave |
At each stage in this developing picture, you can link the properties of the type of radiation with its nature. Alpha radiation is highly ionising because of the large momentum, though relatively modest speed (~10 7m/s) of the alpha particles and their double positive charge. But, given its propensity to interact with atoms (in the air and solids), it has a shorter range and lower penetrating power than the other two types of radiation.
Beta radiation is made up of a stream of beta particles moving extremely fast (about 98% the speed of light). They have less momentum than alpha particles and are less ionising, tending to pass through the air and matter more easily than alpha particles.
Beta particles are noticeably deflected in a magnetic field, much more so than alpha particles, whose deflection cannot easily be measured in a school laboratory. This is because the beta particles have a smaller momentum and experience a bigger force because they are moving faster (although they also have a smaller charge, their speed is more than twice as much as that of an alpha particle).
The deflection of alpha particles can be more noticeable in an electric field. Here the force depends on the charge but not on the speed.
Gamma radiation is an electromagnetic wave. This means it has no charge and is not deflected by magnetic or electric fields. It is weakly ionising and its effects on matter depend among other factors on the intensity of the radiation.
Teaching guidance on the protactinium generator.
When using the protactinium generator you will also need a:
The first steps of the uranium-238 series are involved in this experiment.
The aqueous solution (at the bottom of the bottle) contains the uranium-238, its daughter thorium-234 and the short-lived granddaughter protactinium-234.
Uranium and protactinium both form anionic chloride complexes but thorium does not. At high hydrogen ion concentrations, these complexes will dissolve in the organic layer (which is floating on top of the aqueous solution).
When you shake the bottle, about 95% of the short-lived granddaughter (protactinium) and some of the uranium will be dissolved in the organic layer. The thorium stays in the aqueous layer.
Radioactivity is a property of the innermost nucleus of the atom, so it is not affected by chemical combination.
The granddaughter (in the organic layer) decays without any more being produced by its parent (thorium), all of which is still in the aqueous layer. It emits beta particles, which travel through the plastic wall of the bottle. Isolating the protactinium in the top (organic) layer allows it to decay without any top-up from its parent (thorium).
The radiation from the thorium and uranium should not interfere with the results, for two reasons:
• The counter does not detect the alpha particles from the uranium or the low-energy beta particles from the thorium; it only records the high-energy (2 MeV) beta particles from the granddaughter (protactinium).
• The uranium-238 decays with an extremely long half-life. It yields a meagre, almost constant, stream of low-energy alpha particles. Its daughter, thorium-234, decays with a half-life of 24 days. During the length of this experiment the decay rate can be assumed to be constant. If these two isotopes contribute to the count at all, it will be accommodated in the background count. The stockpile of thoruim is also constantly topped up in the aqueous layer as long as the protactinium is present with the thoruim.
Initially, students may regard atoms as the fundamental chemical particles. True, electrons can be chipped off an atom, and possibly all an atom’s electrons stripped off to leave a bare nucleus; yet according to the simple story, the nucleus is still fixed and determines the element by its charge, Ze.
Therefore, to change one element into another, the alchemist’s dream of lead into gold, would require a change of nuclear charge. At first sight this seems impossible because the nucleus is buried deep in the atom bound together by tremendous forces. But it does happen in radioactive elements.
Initially, students may regard atoms as the fundamental chemical particles. True, electrons can be chipped off an atom, and possibly all an atom’s electrons stripped off to leave a bare nucleus; yet according to the simple story, the nucleus is still fixed and determines the element by its charge, Ze.
Therefore, to change one element into another, the alchemist’s dream of lead into gold, would require a change of nuclear charge. At first sight this seems impossible because the nucleus is buried deep in the atom bound together by tremendous forces. But it does happen in radioactive elements.
Soon after the discovery of radioactivity in 1896 by Becquerel, Marie Curie and her husband Pierre discovered a new element which they named radium. They extracted dangerously large samples of radium from vast quantities of rock and experimented on its radioactive behaviour.
You could say: Radioactive atoms do not just stay there as atoms of ordinary copper do; they are completely different: they are unstable, they suddenly break up, flinging out a particle such as an alpha particle, becoming an atom of a different element.
A radium atom remains a radium atom, with the chemical behaviour of a heavy metal, until it suddenly hurls out this alpha particle. (The alpha particle has such a huge energy that it must come from the nucleus.) The remainder of the radium atom is no longer a heavy metal, but a quite different element. This ‘daughter’ of radium is an atom of a heavy inert gas, the end of the helium, neon, argon, krypton, xenon series. It is called radon. The atomic masses have been measured directly, radium-226, radon-222 (a difference of 4 suggesting that the lost alpha particle is a helium nucleus). Separate measurements confirm this.
When you have a mixture of a parent element and a daughter element which have different chemical properties, then they can be separated by ordinary chemical methods.
Radon gas is itself unstable and radioactive. Each of its atoms suddenly, at an unpredictable moment, hurls out an alpha particle. The remainder is a new atom, very unstable, which is called polonium, the ‘daughter’ of radon and the ‘granddaughter’ of radium. The series continues through several more radioactive elements and stops at a stable form of lead. The series does not begin with radium: it begins with uranium several stages earlier. Radioactive uranium (Z=92) has turned into lead (Z=82).
A century ago, radioactivity was a peculiarity of a few mostly heavy, elements: the last few at the end of the Periodic Table. Nowadays scientists can bombard samples of lighter elements with high speed, high energy protons or neutrons, provided directly or indirectly by an accelerator. They can make unstable isotopes of every element in the periodic table. This has opened up the field of nuclear chemistry. Radioactive isotopes behave chemically like their stable isotopes and can be mixed with them. Their progress as radioactive tags can be traced, like luggage labels, following the progress of a ‘labelled’ isotope through the human body or an industrial process.
All the unstable members of these strange families have a constant, reliable characteristic: the atoms show no signs of ageing, or growing weaker, however long they last. Each radioactive element has a constant chance of breaking up in each succeeding second. This is described by a useful length of time, the ‘half-life’ of the radioactive element. For each individual atom the betting is 50:50 for and against its breaking up at any time during one half-life from now. The break-up seems to be controlled by pure chance. That chance does not change and make the break-up more likely for atoms that need to survive longer.
For radium the half-life is 1650 years. Start with 1000 mg of radium now and 1650 years later you will have only 500 mg left. After a further 1650 years only 250 mg will be left and so on. For radium’s daughter, radon -222, the half-life is 3.8 days. In less than four days half the radon gas will have disappeared. You will find helium gas there instead, with the solid products.
The instability appears to be something inherent in the nuclear structure. Nowadays, taking a wave view of the behaviour of nuclear particles, you can picture a stationary wave pattern defining the life of an alpha particle inside the nucleus. But the wave is not completely confined, it leaks through the potential barrier round the nucleus and runs on as a faint wave outside. The wave is interpreted as describing probabilities of locations. It is not a mechanical wave carrying energy and momentum.
While the alpha particle is expected to be found inside the nucleus, there is a chance of finding it one day outside, despite what would seem an insurmountable potential wall. That chance of the alpha particle being outside, being emitted, is definite and constant, a part of the defining wave property, as long as the nucleus lasts. It suggests that high energy alpha particles go with a short half-life of the parent nucleus.
Teaching guidance discussing the exponential decay of radioactive substances and the mathematical implications.
One of the most important characteristics of radioactivity is that it decays exponentially. This has two basic mathematical implications at this level.
From these features, you can argue, respectively, the following points.
Teaching guidance covering some useful equations on half-lives and exponential decay.
The rate of decay of a radioactive source is proportional to the number of radioactive atoms (N) which are present.
dNdt = -λN
is the decay constant, which is the chance that an atom will decay in unit time. It is constant for a given isotope.
The solution of this equation is an exponential one where N0 is the initial number of atoms present.
N = N0e -λt (Equation 1)
This equation shows one of the properties of an exponential curve: the constant ratio property.
The ratio of the value, N1, at a time t1 to the value, N2, at a time t2 is given by:
N1N2 = e -λt1e -λt2
N1N2 = e -λ(t1-t2)
In a fixed time interval, t2 – t1 is a constant. Therefore the ratio
N1N2 = a constant
So, in a fixed time interval, the value will drop by a constant ratio, wherever that time interval is measured.
Another test for exponential decay is to plot a log graph, which should be a straight line.
Since
N = N0e -λt
Taking natural logs of both sides:
lnN=lnN0-λt
Therefore a graph of N against t will be a straight line with a slope of QuantitySymbol{-λ}.
The half-life is related to the decay constant. A higher probability of decaying (bigger λ) will lead to a shorter half-life.
This can be shown mathematically.
After one half life, the number, N of particles drops to half of N0 (the starting value). So:
N = N02 when t=T½
By substituting this expression in equation (see above),
N02 = N0e -λT½
Taking natural logs of both sides gives:
ln½=-λT½
ln2 = +λT½
T½ = 0.693λ
The IOP wants to support young people to fulfil their potential by doing physics. Please sign the manifesto today so that we can show our politicians there is widespread support for improving equity and inclusion across the education sector.
Sign today